This file needs additional citations for verification. (July 2007) |
The Portuguese President is a cerimonial one. The executive powers are in government's hands, which in turn is supported by the Parliament. Fix the map please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.18.241.77 (talk) 20:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
The role of the President has been fading over the years, with the Constitutional revisions and customary procedures. His powers have been reduced since the 1976 Constitution and he can now be considered ceremonial. Jorge Sampaio even formed the Arraiolos meeting, a meeting of non-executive presidents of European Union.
I can cite the current Constitution (7th Revision, 2005) to show how the limited the Presidential role is, making him de facto subordinate to the Parliament:
- Article 129 - The President cannot leave the country without the consent of the Parliament. The consequence of not complying with this is his removal from office.
- Article 130 - It is up to the Parliament to impeach the President, if he commits crimes, and make him stand for trial.
- Article 131 - Should he resign, he must do so by presenting the resignation to the Parliament.
- Article 133 e) - The President can ONLY dissolve the Parliament and call for elections AFTER meeting with the parties AND the Council of State. (not at his own discretion)
- Article 133 f) - The President names the Prime Minister AFTER meeting with the parties AND taking into account the election results. (not at his own discretion)
- Article 133 g) - The President can ONLY remove the Prime Minister, and the rest of the government, from office if they present a threat to the democratic institutions. (not at his own discretion)
- Article 133 h) to p) - The President gives his approval, or not, to the naming of government officials BY the Prime Minister. (not at his own discretion)
- Article 135 c) - The President can ONLY declare war, or sign peace, under the Government's proposal, with CONSENT of the Parliament.
- Article 136 - The President can veto laws, returning them to the Parliament for discussion. If the Parliament, then, approves them by a majority, he CAN'T veto again.
- Article 138 - The President can only declare a State of Emergency with the Parliament's CONSENT.
- Article 161 - It is up to the Parliament to change the Constitution. It's up to the Parliament to discuss and approve laws.
- Article 286 - The President CANNOT veto changes to the Constitution.
- Article 167 - It is up to the Parliament, the Government, organized citizens and Regional Parliaments, to propose laws. (not the President)HumanCapacitator (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm not registered on Wikipedia, but there's a great mistake on this map. Portugal is a semi-presidential republic. The President can veto, he nominates the Government, he is the one that declares war, he is the one that sends laws to the Constitutional Court to be checked, etc.
Check the works of Jorge Reis Novais and Duverger on Portugal. Also, countries like Angola are semi-presidential Republics because they inspired their recent constitutions on the Portuguese Constitution of 1976 (Portugal colonised Angola) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.247.161.142 (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
A much more significant distinction than between non-practising monarchy and republic is the distinction between a coalition government and a winner take all one party system. to be informative, this file should make that distinction.· Lygophile has spoken 13:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
The army have taken power, suspended the Constitution, and declared that the President of the Constitutional Council has replaced President Morsi. The colour for Egypt should be changed to olive. 82.154.137.87 (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
South Korea is semi presidential. 112.198.79.2 (talk) 12:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm not qualified to edit the image myself, but the Malay peninsula accidentally got coloured in with Thailand in the last update. (Jurryaany (talk) 12:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC))
186.188.238.66 (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC) I think North Korea should be classified as an absolute, totalitarian, monarchy. Also I believe military dictatorship government colour is to be confused with other light colour (light green) which is attached to the fourth republican government type...
Sudan should be grey as it's currently under a transition government and Mali should be dark green since the army coup on August this year.
--Guriezous (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
I think the color of Myanmar should be changed to olive green due to the recent military coup. Also, I believe that the color for the parliamentary republics with executive president should be changed in order to make it more distinct with countries under military dictatorship. --RyanW1995 (talk) 07:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
@GlowstoneUnknown I changed the information on the Wikipedia page for the presidential system, and the page lacks updating. Since the adoption of a new constitution on July 25, 2022, the system has become presidential. Thanks. Mohamed Amine Trabelsi Talk 18:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)