(edit conflict)Weak oppose - the white blends in too well with the colour of the bird, and the snow is distracting. Great photo otherwise... --Thelb416:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Support Most of the charm of this picture is the fact it only uses tones of gray and blue. Besides, it is crisp and clear. --Alvesgaspar18:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Support. Stunning picture, and good encyclopedic value. A tiny bit of blown highlights, but that's to be expected with snow. If anything, in my opinion, the things Thelb4 talked about make it a better picture. NauticaShades20:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Weak Support In terms of picture, this is beautiful. However, in terms of how unique it is, I'm not so sure. My own opinion.--Steven01:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Support Very nice and pretty. What would make it better is if it was more zoomed in to the bird and less of the surrounding picture is visible. --Midnight Rider02:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Support There's a bit of grain when you look closely, but that's pretty much part and parcel to an image at this resolution. Excellent picture. Severnjc02:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Support. Amazingly crisp focus on the bird. I don't think I could take a picture like that even if I had $5000 worth of photo gear. (Besides, the bird would probably fly away first.) --Elkman - (Elkspeak)04:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Support. Nice picture. Since the birds chest is slightly grey it allows a contrast from the snow. (Guess I don't find the snow distracting) Dark jedi requiem20:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong support Wonderful picture, you can see the individual snow crystals on the birds beak. And the downy feathers on it's belly. The tail is soft on focus, but that is forgivable to me. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me)16:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)