Reason

Another great cityscape photo from Benh. High quality, aesthetic and of great value to the Bangkok article.

Articles in which this image appears

Bangkok and Tiger Cub Economies

Creator

Commons:User:Benh

• Support as nominator --Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support Nice EV, interesting to view --Muhammad(talk) 03:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support per above. Elekhh (talk) 07:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support, very good quality for a night image of this breadth... and a great view of the city. gren グレン 02:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support beautiful photo, makes me nostalgic for when I lived there. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
• Weak Support Very good quality but as per prev night shots up for nom there are several well lit areas that appear to be detail-less due to over-exposure... Im not too technical so not sure if that's exactly the right reason but I know what I'm trying to say! Most noticable on the centre tall building with the well lit white top - I cannot view much detail on the top of that building due to what I think are blown highlights... Other than a few little examples of this the picture as a whole is very good but I can't give full support as IMO I think this harms the picture... Gazhiley (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm in agreement with you on that point. If it were me, I would have reduced the exposure a little which, as you said, would have minimised the detail lost to blown highights. Still, as it is, I think it's still a great image. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 13:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
    • Exactly... I knew it was something like that... Yeah still a great picture hence support, just not a full support with those issues... Gazhiley (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support wow! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support--Mbz1 (talk) 23:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Promoted File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)