Comment My inclination on this one is that it's a very different pose and angle, so there might be a place for it, though I don't like the GDFL thing. I'm almost inclined to put it into the article for the image with the caption along the lines of "The bird has a very distinctive yellow streak below its eye", and see if it sticks. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs12:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
(This nom defaults to delist, since it's not used in articles, and, on the whole, I'm fine with that. I'm just bringing up the only option for salvaging its FP status) Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs12:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Huh. Actually... and it's a bit late to realise this I know: @JJ Harrison: Isn't the image we just promoted Juvenile plumage? It lacks the black stripe under the yellow. Or is it a subspecies? Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs12:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Delist - I still believe the images are too similar to have two featured pictures. Both images are good, but the recent promotion is excellent. Mattximus (talk) 01:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
There is not enough support to delist the current featured picture. As the image is still used (was added back in the article more than seven days ago), it can retain that status. ArmbrustTheHomunculus15:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)