In this article we will explore in detail 1857 United Kingdom general election, a topic that has aroused the interest of various sectors and that has generated a wide debate in today's society. 1857 United Kingdom general election has significantly impacted various aspects of our daily lives, and its influence has become increasingly evident in recent years. Through a comprehensive analysis, we will examine the many facets of 1857 United Kingdom general election, from its origins and history to its implications in today's world. Additionally, we will examine how 1857 United Kingdom general election has evolved over time and how it has affected different people and communities around the world. This topic is of great relevance today, so it is essential to understand its ramifications and challenges in order to address it effectively.
In the 1857 United Kingdom general election, the Whigs, led by Lord Palmerston, won a majority in the House of Commons as the Conservative vote fell significantly. The election had been provoked by a vote of censure in Palmerston's government over his approach to the Arrow affair which led to the Second Opium War.
There is no separate tally of votes or seats for the Peelites. They did not contest elections as an organised party but more as independent Free trade Conservatives with varying degrees of distance from the two main parties.
The general election of 1857 is unique in our history: the only election ever conducted as a simple plebiscite in favour of an individual. Even the "coupon" election of 1918 claimed to be more than a plebiscite for Lloyd George; even Disraeli and Gladstone offered a clash of policies as well as of personalities. In 1857 there was no issue before the electorate except whether Palmerston should be Prime Minister; and no one could pretend that Palmerston had any policy except to be himself.
^ abSeveral country and university seats held by Conservatives were uncontested, and many urban multi-member constituencies that tended to vote Liberal had multiple candidates, so this is an misleading figure. Therefore, national swing is not applicable to elections in this era.