Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc.
In this article, the topic of Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc. will be addressed in a detailed and exhaustive manner, with the aim of providing the reader with a complete and understandable vision of this aspect. Its origins, its evolution over time, its implications in society and its relevance today will be explored. Likewise, different points of view will be analyzed and relevant data and statistics will be presented to support the arguments presented. Through this analysis, we seek to offer an enriching perspective that invites reflection and debate.
Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc.
a record shop rented sound recordings to customers who would also purchase blank tape and then use a recording machine on the store premises to copy the rented recording onto the blank tape. The store owner's knowledge of the likely use of the blank tape was patent.
Federal courts have held that secondary tort liability exists when:
enabling or inciting another to infringe, at least when the enabler knows that her conduct will result in infringement. Decisions dating back several decades recognize that one who supplies the means to infringe, and knows of the use to which the means will be put (or turns a blind eye), can be held liable for contributory infringement. In the early cases, however, the relationship between the supplier and the user of the means was sufficiently close, that there could be little doubt of either the knowledge or the nexus between the means and the infringement.