In the following article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Gregory v. City of Chicago. From its origins to its evolution today, we will explore all aspects related to this topic. We will discover its impact in different areas, its relationship with other areas of study and its relevance in contemporary society. Through an in-depth and detailed analysis, we will examine the various points of view and expert opinions that will allow us to better understand the importance and relevance of Gregory v. City of Chicago in today's world.
Gregory and others were improperly convicted of disorderly conduct based on the disorderly behavior of bystanders to their First Amendment-protected demonstration.
Social activists, including comedian Dick Gregory, protested against school segregation in Chicago, Illinois. Twelve years earlier, in Brown v. Board of Education, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled school segregationunconstitutional. The protesters marched from Chicago's city hall to the mayor's residence in the white neighborhood of Bridgeport. After the march concluded, white bystanders began to act unruly and heckle the protesters; when they could not contain the hecklers' activity, police asked the protesters to disperse. The protesters did not disperse and were consequently arrested, and subsequently convicted by a jury, of violating Chicago's disorderly conduct ordinance. The protesters appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court. That court upheld their conviction, holding that the protesters' refusal to obey the police order justified the convictions. Aided by the ACLU, the protesters appealed to the US Supreme Court.
Opinion of the Court
The US Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, overturned the conviction for several reasons:
"Petitioners were denied due process since there was no evidence to support their convictions"
"The convictions were for demonstrating, not for refusing to obey police orders."
"The trial judge's charge allowed the jury to convict for acts protected by the First Amendment. Stromberg v. California"
Justice Hugo Black, in a concurring opinion, argued that arresting demonstrators as a consequence of unruly behavior of bystanders would amount to a "heckler's veto."