Ivšić's law

In today's world, Ivšić's law remains a fundamental and intriguing topic that attracts the attention of academics, scientists, professionals and enthusiasts alike. The importance of Ivšić's law is manifested in different areas, from medicine to technology, through politics and culture. Throughout history, Ivšić's law has been the subject of study and debate, demonstrating its relevance and impact on society. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Ivšić's law, from its origin and evolution to its current influence, with the aim of providing a comprehensive view of this fascinating and constantly changing topic.
This article is about the accentual law in Proto-Slavic. For the sound law in Proto-Indo-European, see Stang's law.

Ivšić's law, also Stang's law or Stang-Ivšić's law, is a Common Slavic accent law named after Stjepan Ivšić (1911) and Christian Schweigaard Stang (1957); the two linguists independently discovered the law in those years.

The law explains the origin of the Proto-Slavic neoacute accent occurring in the accent paradigm b as retractive from the following syllable.

Retraction from stressed weak yer

During the Late Common Slavic period, the short vowels *ь and *ъ (known as yers, also written *ĭ *ŭ) developed into "strong" and "weak" variants according to Havlík's law. The accented weak variants could no longer carry an accent, which was thus retracted onto the preceding syllable. That syllable gained a rising neoacute accent. It is denoted with a tilde diacritic ⟨◌̃⟩ on historically "long" syllables (*a, *i, *u, *y, *ě, *ę, *ǫ, *VR) and with a grave accent ⟨◌̀⟩ on historically "short" syllables (*e, *o, *ь, *ъ).

In conservative Serbo-Croatian dialects of Čakavian and Old Štokavian (e.g., Slavonian), this neoacute is preserved as a separate tone, distinct from the old acute and circumflex. Ivšić designated the long neoacute in Čakavian with the same circumflex symbol as the Lithuanian circumflex due to their phonetic similarity.

Compare:

PSl. *pirstu̍ > Common Slavic *pьrstъ̍ > *pь̃rstъ (Čakavian pr̃st, Russian perst, N pl perstý)

Retraction from medial circumflexed syllables

Retraction also occurred on medial long circumflexed (i.e., non-acuted) syllables; for example, on verbs in *-iti. On the basis of the attested forms nȍsīte, vrãtite Ivšić assumed the earlier forms *nosȋte, *vortȋte, which would also yield the neoacute by retracting the long circumflex accent onto the preceding syllable. This retraction is uncontroversial if the preceding syllable is long; in the case of short preceding syllables, it is generally accepted, but some argue that it is analogical to the long neoacute in individual (mostly West Slavic) languages.

Additionally, Ivšić's law explains the acute accent on certain jā-stem nouns such as sũša (Slavonian Štokavian dialects), vȍlja (with shortened neoacute).

Borrowings from other languages show that Ivšić's law operated after Dybo's law, and had the effect of partially reversing it. Compare:

  • PSl. *kȁrlju 'king' (originally the name of Charlemagne) > (Dybo's law) *karlju̍ > (Ivšić's law) *kãrlju > Čakavian krãlj.

Notes

  1. ^ Matasović (2008:168)
  2. ^ Kapović (2008:4f)
  3. ^ Stang (1957:22–23)
  4. ^ E.g. Vaillant (1950:265–268)

References

  • Matasović, Ranko (2008), Poredbenopovijesna gramatika hrvatskoga jezika [A Comparative-Historical Grammar of Croatian] (in Croatian), Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, ISBN 978-953-150-840-7
  • Ivšić, Stjepan (1911), "Prilog za slavenski akcenat" [A contribution to Slavic accent], Rad JAZU (in Croatian) (187): 133–208
  • Stang, Christian (1957), Slavonic accentuation, Oslo{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Kapović, Mate (2008), "Razvoj hrvatske akcentuacije", Filologija (in Croatian), 51, Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti: 1–39
  • Vaillant, André (1950), Grammaire comparée des langues slaves [Comparative grammar of Slavic languages], vol. I, Lyon: IAC
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia